Monday, September 29, 2008

Why The Bailout Failed

Pelosi Tirade Before Crucial Vote Reason

Make no mistake about it, this is now the Democrat's Economy.

Having failed to produce enough votes to bailout Wall Street fat-cats and primary Democrat Donors from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other big  Wall Street Banks that the Democrats have FAILED to regulate these past two years, we present to you the reason the bailout package failed today.

This was Nancy Pelosi, the Democrat House Speaker just minutes before the vote:

Is it any wonder the vote failed?  With rhetoric like this, why would any Republican vote for the abhorrent monstrosity that is the Bailout Package?  The Democrats have all the votes they need in the House to pass whatever legislation they want.  They didn't need a single Republican vote to pass the bill. They failed.  The fallout is squarely on their heads.

And here are the Democrats just last year, stating there's no problem with Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac.  (Notice all the Republican's in the video calling for regulating Fannie & Freddie, and notice the Congressional Black Caucus members in this video protecting "one of their own.")

Democrats need to face up to a few facts here.

First, it was the Jimmy Carter Administration along with a Democrat Controlled Congress that passed the "Community Reinvestment Act" of 1977 that outlawed "redlining" and prohibited banks from refusing to loan money to low-income 'urban' dwellers.

Second, it was the Clinton Administration in 1992 that put massive pressure on Banks to grant more mortgages and loans to the "poor" and "minotrities."  Banks were threatened with punitive action if they did not comply.  Clinton's Secretary of HUD Andrew Cuomo investigated Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for racial discrimintation and proposed that 50% of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of low to moderate income borrowers by the year 2001 (the end of the Clinton Administration.)

Instead of looking at "outdated criteria," such as the mortgage applicant's credit history and ability to make a down payment, banks were encouraged to consider nontraditional measures of credit-worthiness, such as having a good jump shot or having a missing child named "Caylee." Threatening lawsuits, Clinton's Federal Reserve demanded that banks treat welfare payments and unemployment benefits as valid income sources to qualify for a mortgage. That isn't a joke -- it's a fact.

When Democrats controlled both the executive and legislative branches, political correctness was given a veto over sound business practices. In 1999, liberals were bragging about extending affirmative action to the financial sector. Los Angeles Times reporter Ron Brownstein hailed the Clinton administration's affirmative action lending policies as one of the "hidden success stories" of the Clinton administration, saying that "black and Latino homeownership has surged to the highest level ever recorded."

Meanwhile, economists were screaming from the rooftops that the Democrats were forcing mortgage lenders to issue loans that would fail the moment the housing market slowed and deadbeat borrowers couldn't get out of their loans by selling their houses.

 A decade later, the housing bubble burst and, as predicted, food-stamp-backed mortgages collapsed. Democrats set an affirmative action time-bomb and now it's gone off. In Bush's first year in office, the White House chief economist, N. Gregory Mankiw, warned that the government's "implicit subsidy" of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, combined with loans to unqualified borrowers, was creating a huge risk for the entire financial system.

Rep. Barney Frank denounced White House Chief Economist Mankiw, saying he had no "concern about housing." How dare he oppose suicidal loans to people who can't repay them!

The New York Times reported that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were "under heavy assault by the Republicans," but these entities still had "important political allies" in the Democrats. And why wouldn't they?  Banking Committee Chariman Chris Dodd (D. CT) had received more than $500,000 in campaign contributions from Fannie Mae, and a rising star in the Democrat Party named Barak Obama received just over $400,000.  Democrats Barney Frank and Hillary Clinton also received massive campaign contributions from Fannie & Freddie Mac.  Surely Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac had allies in the Do Nothing Congress controlled by the Democrat Party!


Now, at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars, middle-class taxpayers are going to be forced to bail out the Democrats' two most important constituent groups: rich Wall Street bankers and welfare recipients.

Political correctness had already ruined education, sports, science and entertainment. But it took a Democratic president with a Democratic congress for political correctness to wreck the financial industry.

Democrats have accomplished in a few short years what Bin Laden has been trying to do for more than a decade now: Wreck America's economic system.

Thank you, Democrats!

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Obama Campaign Now Threatening Wisconsin Broadcasters

Threats of prison time, loss of license for broadcasting "lies" about Obama. 

This is clearly out of control Das Fuhrer, Obama Bin Nazi is now threatening Wisconsin broadcasters with fines, loss of license, and jail time if they broadcast political ads that "lie" about Obama's positions.  If it weren't so funny anymore, its getting scary as we're now getting a preview of just how Obama would seize control of the mainstream media should this country be stupid enough to elect him.

Obama campaign spokesman Damien Thorn warned broadcasters that they will be held accountable for any “lies” they air running up to the election and after, once the Obama Administration takes office on November 5.

The threat was sparked by a series of anti-Obama ads produced by the National Rifle Association. The ads warn voters that if Senator Obama’s past record is any guide, his election should be expected to lead to further abridgements of the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms.

While not challenging the historical accuracy of the ads, Thorn contended that “they misrepresent Senator Obama’s current positions on this issue.” “The Senator is saying that he supports an individual’s right to own a weapon, subject to commonsense regulations,” Thorn claimed. “An Obama Administration will extend the right to own a firearm to those individuals who can demonstrate suffici ent need for such a right.”

“We would never, for example, deny the right of someone like Senator Joe Biden to his Beretta,” Thorn continued. “Senators are important people with many enemies. They have a right to protect themselves. The NRA’s contention that we would interfere with such a right is a lie that will bring consequences down on all who perpetuate it.”

The consequences, according to Thorn, would include loss of broadcast licenses, substantial fines, and even imprisonment for “willful or repeated violations.”


"Demonstrate a need for such a right?"  What part of "RIGHT" does the Obama campaign not understand?  We would have to "demonstrate a need" for our right to own a firearm and protect ourselOBAMA-INCOMPETENTves?

This is flat out MARXISM if we've ever seen it!  This isn't "supporting the 2nd Amendment" Obama is advocating a MEANS TEST to obtain the "right" to own a gun!

Once again, Barak Hussein Obama is DANGEROUSLY INCOMPETENT to be President.

"I Have A Bracelet Too!"

Parents of Ryan Jopek tell Obama to stop wearing their son's bracelet

The parents of Sergeant Ryan David Jopek who was killed in action in Iraq earlier this year have asked Barack Hussein Obama to stop wearing their son's bracelet and using his death to further the Obama campaign.   ihazabraclit

Obama is ignoring the family's request.  Newsbusters has the details including the information that Jopek's mother is an Obama supporter who now finds herself in a very uncomfortable position.  Ryan David Jopek's father was on Wisconsin Public Radio yesterday talking about the family's reaction to Obama's using their son's death to further his own political goals. 

Audio of the program can be found HERE.


Brian Jopek: Because of some of the negative feedback she's gotten on the Internet, you know Internet blogs, you know people accusing her of... or accusing Obama of trying to get votes doing it... and that sort of thing.

Radio Host Moberg: Yeah

Jopek: She has turned down any subsequent interviews with the media because she just didn't want it to get turned into something that it wasn't. She had told me in an email that she had asked, actually asked Mr. Obama to not wear the bracelet any more at any of his public appearances. Which I don't think he's...

Moberg: It has been a while since he's brought it up.

Jopek: Right. But, the other night I was watching the news and he was on, uh, speaking somewhere and he was still wearing it on his right wrist. I could see it on his right wrist. So, that's his own choice. I mean that's something Barack Obama, that's a choice that he continues to wear it despite Tracy asking him not to... Because she is a Barack Obama supporter and she didn't want to do anything to sabotage his campaign, so, if he's still wearing the bracelet then, uh, that of course is entirely up to him.

Moberg: Maybe there's a difference between wearing it and making a point to bring it up in your speeches?

I can't think of a more cruel thing to do, than to ignore the request of the family of a fallen soldier and continue to politicize the death of one of America's best.  In Obama's mind, politics must simply be more important than the wishes of a family of one of America's fallen soldiers.

Certainly OBama is banking on the fact that Jopek's mother is an OBama supporter and won't speak out against him.

But we will.

Shame on you Barack Hussein Obama.

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Missouri Counters "Obama Truth Squads"

Governor declares it a "violation of Civil rights" to intimidate, threaten with arrest those who disagree with Obama

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Saturday, September 27, 2008 Contact: Jessica Robinson, 573-751-0290 Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement

Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement

JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his critics.

“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.

“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.

“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.


It's high time someone stepped up and stopped this Obama nonsense!  "Truth Squads" my ass.  More like propaganda control and intimidating those who don't agree with Herr Obama.  Let's see some of these "lawyers" who volunteered for the "Truth Squad" in Missouri brought up before the Missouri Bar Association and charged with abuse of their law licenses.

Start with St. Louis Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer and St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Bob McCulloch.

Disbar them all, that would be justice.

OBama "Truth Squad"

KMOV-TV in St. Louis reports that the OBama campaign is forming "Truth Squads"  in Missouri and presumably across the country.

Here's the deal.  If the OBama campaign thinks someone not telling the truth about OBama, they're going to sue that someone in a court of law, and demand that person's arrest!baobm

Where have we seen these tactics used before?  How about Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, Russia during the Cold War, and World War II when Joseph Goebbels had those in the media who wouldn't cooperate in spreading Nazi propaganda arrested and often shot to death.

Luckily for us, everything we post here is sourced often in Obama's own words showing his flip-flops and lies.  Gee, I sure hope I don't get sued by the Obama "Truth Squad."


Here's the news report from KMOV in St. Louis linking the Obama campaign with the "truth squads"

Barak Obama - Not Ready To Lead

We've said it before here, and we'll say it again: Barak Obama is DANGEROUSLY INCOMPETENT and NOT READY TO LEAD.  His inexperience is unquestionable.

That's why we're particularly impressed that less than 30 minutes after the first debate, the McCain campaign introduced their latest commercial documenting 5 of the 9 times that Obama was forced to agree with John McCain.  A perfect representation of Obama's inexperience, and a demonstration of the fact that Obama is positively clueless about the corrupt Washington culture, and the reality of dealing with a Nuclear Iran, for example.

One last comment before we post the clip.  Obama likes to say he "stood up and opposed the war in Iraq more than six (6) years ago.

Well, where was Obama 6 years ago?

Answer: he was a Junior State Legislator taking his marching orders from the Corrupt Chicago Democrat Machine, and his mentor Illinois State Senate President Emil Jones. 

Was it "politically risky" for Obama - a Junior Illinois State Legislator to stand up and oppose the Iraq war?  Not at all.  Not when he gets to hide behind the corrupt Chicago Democrat machine and throw rocks like a street punk.  But that's the history of Obama' political "career" and his 143 days in the US Senate.  He hasn't introduced a single bill, he hasn't done anything politically "risky" to do the right thing for the Country.

That's why he's forced to agree with McCain time and again during the first debate.  Obama has a childish like "Me Too!" flaw when it comes to debating an actual leader.

This video proves our point.

Obama Linked To Failed Fannie Mae Chief Franklin Raines

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Obama's Backchannel Negotiations With Iran


Top Obama Campaign Member Met With Ahmadinejad in New York Tonight

Free Republic

A founding member of the campaign of Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois met in New York City tonight with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Jodie Evans, who co-hosted Obama's first major fundraiser in Hollywood in February 2007 just after Obama announced his candidacy and is a top fundraiser and donor to Obama's campaign, led a delegation of leftist anti-American groups that held a private meeting near the United Nations. The stated purpose of the meeting was to "serve as an opening for diplomatic resolution" to prevent war between Iran and the United States.

The government of Iran is listed as a state sponsor of terrorism by the State Department and is strongly believed to be developing nuclear weapons.

Obama has stated that he would be willing to meet with Ahmadinejad and other enemies of the United States without conditions. Evans met with Obama in Beverly Hills last week at an exclusive $28,500 per person fundraiser. As a bundler for Obama, Evans is granted regular briefings with top Obama staff members and meeting with Obama and his vice presidential nominee Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware.

Obama has come under heavy criticism from military families and troops support organizations over his alliance with Evans.

Evans is co-founder of the pro-terrorist group Code Pink and works with state sponsors of terrorism to undermine America in the war on terror. She also has publicly announced her support for the terrorists in Iraq, her sympathy for Osama bin Laden and her "love" of Hugo Chavez.

Given Evans' closeness to regular contacts with Obama and his campaign, it is fair to ask if she is acting as an intermediary for Obama.

Obama recently put his seal of approval on Evans' attempt to storm the stage during the acceptance speech of Republican vice presidential nominee Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska when he welcomed her to his two Hollywood fundraisers last week, the exclusive $28,500 per person event and the $2500 per person event Barbra Streisand sang at the same evening.

Others attending the meeting with Ahmadinejad included anti-American activists who support the terrorists in Iraq and work anti-American governments: Medea Benjamin, Brian Becker, Leslie Cagan, Larry Holmes and Ramsey Clark.

The press release announcing the meeting can be found here.

How Clinton Era Made Subprime Mess Inevitable

Democrats strike again!  Social Engineering Caused This Mess!!

Why Democrats Should NOT Be Trusted With The Economy!

From Investors Business Daily, Sept. 23rd, 2008

One of the most frequently asked questions about the subprime market meltdown and housing crisis is: How did the government get so deeply involved in the housing market?

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, even into the early 1990s, weren't the juggernauts they'd later be.

While President Carter in 1977 signed the Community Reinvestment Act, which pushed Fannie and Freddie to aggressively lend to minority communities, it was Clinton who supercharged the process. After entering office in 1993, he extensively rewrote Fannie's and Freddie's rules.

In so doing, he turned the two quasi-private, mortgage-funding firms into a semi-nationalized monopoly that dispensed cash to markets, made loans to large Democratic voting blocs and handed favors, jobs and money to political allies. This potent mix led inevitably to corruption and the Fannie-Freddie collapse.

Despite warnings of trouble at Fannie and Freddie, in 1994 Clinton unveiled his National Homeownership Strategy, which broadened the CRA in ways Congress never intended.

Addressing the National Association of Realtors that year, Clinton bluntly told the group that "more Americans should own their own homes." He meant it.

Clinton saw homeownership as a way to open the door for blacks and other minorities to enter the middle class.

Though well-intended, the problem was that Congress was about to change hands, from the Democrats to the Republicans. Rather than submit legislation that the GOP-led Congress was almost sure to reject, Clinton ordered Robert Rubin's Treasury Department to rewrite the rules in 1995.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Who's Responsible For The Fannie/Freddie Mess?

Video Exposes Fannie Mae Incestuous Relationship With Democrats, Congressional Black Caucus

While there are no 'clean hands' in the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac implosion, the evidence has been mounting against the Democrats as being the primary culprits and enablers of the culture of corruption that plagued both organizations.

As we now know, Chris Dodd (D. CT) the Chairman of the finance committee responsible for oversight of Fannie & Freddie was asleep at the wheel.  Not only that, he's the #1 recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae (Source: FEC Reports.)  Imagine if a Republican was head of the same finance committee that had oversight of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac was the #1 recipient of campaign contributions.

The #2 recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae is none other than Barack Obama.  Obama took more than $400,000 from Fannie Mae between 2006 and today, to finance his run for the highest office in the world.  Imagine, a Republican candidate being the #2 recipient of campaign contributions of the failed Fannie Mae, and backing the bailout plan!

Yet, that's precisely what Barack Hussein Obama is.  And here's the video to prove the link between the Congressional Black Caucus, Fannie Mae and Barack Hussein Obama.  (Note: Obama's wife is featured prominently in the opening portion of the video.)

Your comments are welcome, press the link below.

Monday, September 22, 2008

Obama Losing Ground In Own Backyard

Draws Less Than Sarah Palin in Green Bay, Wisconsin

Recent polls in Wisconsin (Obama's "back yard") show he's lost considerable ground to John McCain.  A state that the Obama Campaign once considered "safe" for them has become a battleground.

Polls show Obama and McCain in a statistical dead-heat after Obama had previously led in the state by up to 14 points.

What's going on with the Obama campaign?

Consider Obama's latest stop in Green Bay Wisconsin today.  Less than 6,000 people showed up to cheer Obama in the Resch Center, next to Lambeau Field in Green Bay.  Just a week ago, John McCain and Sarah Palin packed the place to the rafters with many standing outside hoping to catch a glimpse of the GOP ticket.

Obama's descent in the polls can be directly attributed to two things.  The first is Sarah Palin.  Charismatic in her own right, she's not the empty suit that Obama is.  The public sees the difference between Obama and Palin, and they're choosing Palin.  Obama's biggest mistake of his campaign was to try and run against Palin instead of McCain.  Admittedly, John McCain isn't the most energetic & charismatic figure on the campaign trail.  Fact is, Palin over-shadows McCain. But in doing so, she way overshadows Obama as a result. 

Secondly, the American Public is now paying attention post Labor Day and is seeing Obama for the empty suit he is. The fact that Obama has been playing the race card as of late does nothing but turn off the very voters he needs the most: the angst filled, self-hating liberal elites he needs to win.  Obama has played out the "guilt card" and it's not working anymore.

Additionally, the more voters learn about Obama and his ties to corrupt politicians in Illinois and notably Chicago, the less they like him.  Obama is nothing more than the equivalent of a Chicago street punk, politically speaking.  

As I've written before on this blog, Obama is the byproduct of the corrupt Chicago political machine.  His service as a "junior" state legislator in the Illinois State Senate was unremarkable in Obama's lack of accomplishment.  His voting record matched that of State Senate Leader Emil Jones.  In other words, Obama never cast a vote on his own - he took his orders from the Democrat Machine.  Then there's the conviction of Obama fund-raiser Tony Rezko, who funnelled hundreds of thousands of dollars to Obama's campaigns over the last decade.  Obama's name was mentioned during Rezko's trial repeatedly, and a federal investigation in Illinois led by Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald continues to probe the Obama-Rezko-Blagojevich relationship. 

Voters in this country have often joked that even the dead vote in Chicago.  Those of us who actually live here know the dead vote early and often. 

So why are Obama's crowds shrinking?  Perhaps this ad from the McCain/Palin camp explains why. 

Sunday, September 21, 2008

The "Right" To Tell The Truth

Mainstream Media In Bed With Democrats To Cover-Up Truth About Obama

Published: September 20, 2008 - New York Times Editorial

The wholesale descent into Swift Boat campaigning has been blocked — for now — by a federal judge in Virginia. But voters should not rest easy. A group calling itself The Real Truth About Obama is appealing the ruling.

The group aims to block federal regulations so it can spend unlimited money on a commercial smearing the Democratic nominee as a zealous proponent of any and all abortion on demand — “at any time during pregnancy, as many times as a woman wants one.”

If the group were to win on appeal, it would signal open season for countless stealth groups to flood the remaining weeks of the campaign with underhanded attack ads. The courts must uphold the law, heeding the Federal Election Commission’s warning of “serious harm to the public” if the attack group prevails.

Posing as a mere “issue advocacy” operation, the group’s ad attacks Mr. Obama’s character and accuses him of “lying” about his abortion record. In truth, it trashes the candidate’s nuanced position. It even employs an Obama-like voice pledging to make taxpayers pay for abortions, help minors conceal abortions from their parents, and legalize late-term abortions.

To spread these lies, the group wants an injunction against the election commission’s disclosure and spending rules, instituted after the Swift Boaters of 2004 were belatedly ruled in violation of election law.

Voters do not need a repeat of operatives from both parties running nonprofit shadow operations, fobbing off the most vicious attack ads as innocent issue messages. The constitutionality of the F.E.C. rules was upheld by a federal judge, who should be supported by the appeals court. The F.E.C. must also be vigilant for what inevitably will be fresh attempts to mislead voters with fresh lies.

The truth about Obama's stance on abortion is this: Barak Obama had three opportunities to protect babies that survived abortions.  Each time, Obama voted "NO" to protecting the lives of those children who were born ALIVE through the heinous procedure known as Partial Birth Abortion.


As a Junior State Senator in Illinois from 2001 through 2003, Barak Obama voted "NO" on the following bills that would've protected the lives of babies that survived abortion procedures:

2001 - Illinois State Legislature

Senate Bill 1095, Born Alive Infant Protection Act

Obama's "no" vote in the IL Senate Judiciary Committeehere, March 28, 2001

Transcript of Obama's verbal opposition to Born Alive on the IL Senate floor, March 30, 2001, pages 84-90

Obama's "present" vote on the IL Senate floor, March 30, 2001

2002 - Illinois State Legislature

Senate Bill 1662, Born Alive Infant Protection Act

Obama's "no" vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee, March 6, 2002

Transcript of Obama's verbal opposition to Born Alive on the IL Senate floor, April 4, 2002, pages 28-35

Obama's "no" vote on the IL Senate floor, April 4, 2002

Listen to audio from Obama's 2002 IL Senate floor debate wherein he argued that while babies might be aborted alive, it would be a "burden" to a mother's "original decision" to assess and treat them.

2003 - Illinois State Legislature (After Democrats took Control of the Illinois State Senate)

Senate Bill 1082, Born Alive Infant Protection Act

Democrats took control of the IL Senate with the 2002 elections. This year Born Alive was sent to the Health & Human Services Committee, chaired by Barack Obama.

As can be seen on the vote docket, Obama first voted to amend SB1082 to add the "neutrality clause" from the federal version of Born Alive to the IL version to make them absolutely identical. (DP#1 means "Do Pass Amendment #1.)

Then Obama voted against the identical version. (DPA means, "Do Pass as Amended.)

Additional corroboration of Obama's vote: IL State Senate Republican Staff Analysis of SB 1082, March 12-13, 2003, bottom of page 2

For the years following 2003, Barak Hussein Obama has consistently LIED about his position, stating the wording between the Illinois Bill and the Federal Bill as passed were not the same.  In fact, they were and Barak Hussein Obama himself introduced the amendment in the Illinois Legislature to make it so!  As recently as August 16, 2008 Obama maintained his assertion that the two bills were not the same.

It gets better though.  The "non-partisan" (translate: left-wing liberal) group FactCheck.Org has since verified that Obama misrepresented his position and in fact voted against identical legislation at the Illinois State level as was overwhelmingly passed at the Federal Level - which he said he supported - misrepresenting his vote in Illinois!

Finally, it's indisputable that Barak Hussein Obama has lied, misrepresented and flip-flopped his way through this issue as the August 18th New York Sun  carried Obama's admission he "misrepresented" (lied about) his position against Partial Birth Abortion.

If we truly are electing someone to the highest office in the world that is expected to exercise good judgement and to tell the truth to the American People then we as voters in this country have no choice but to vote AGAINST someone who consistently LIES about his position on this issue, and has continued to do so even past August 18th when he finally admitted the truth.

Saturday, September 20, 2008

Liberal Lamestream Media Bias Exposed

Former Alaska Senator Mike Gravel (D) Defends Sarah Palin

I don't think I could've possibly stumbled on a better example of partisan media bias than what you're about to see.  Two media wanna-be's interview former Alaska Senator Mike Gravel (D) thinking they're going to get the dirt on Sarah Palin.

Boy, did Mike Gravel turn the tables on them. 

Every once in awhile we're surprised when we run across an honest, objective Democrat.  Here's one.  Mike Gravel is our kinda guy.  We may disagree with his political philosophy, but here's a guy who's not allowed a political party or the culture of corruption in Washington DC color his objectivity.

We salute you, Mike Gravel!

One Third Of White Democrats Have Negative View of Blacks (and Obama)

The Party of "Tolerance" Demonstrates It's Intolerance

Note: The focus group in this poll is White Democrats, which is to say not all White American's.  What does this mean?  No Republicans were included in this poll! 

Note the 'slam' on Republican's who won't vote for Obama - but not because he's black - because he's simply a democrat.

Interestingly, roughly half of White's say they'll vote for Obama - and somehow that's still "racism" when Blacks say they'll vote overwhelming for Obama to the tune of 95%.  Somehow, that isn't racism according to this article and indeed the mainstream media?

Racism by any other name, is still racism.  And the fact that 95% of Black American's are voting for Obama simply because he's black is the highest form of racism this writer has seen in a long time.

Bigotry, thy name is the Democrat Party!

Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON - Deep-seated racial misgivings could cost Barack Obama the White House if the election is close, according to an AP-Yahoo News poll that found one-third of white Democrats harbor negative views toward blacks — many calling them "lazy," "violent" or responsible for their own troubles.

The poll, conducted with Stanford University, suggests that the percentage of voters who may turn away from Obama because of his race could easily be larger than the final difference between the candidates in 2004 — about two and one-half percentage points.

Certainly, Republican John McCain has his own obstacles: He's an ally of an unpopular president and would be the nation's oldest first-term president. But Obama faces this: 40 percent of all white Americans hold at least a partly negative view toward blacks, and that includes many Democrats and independents.

More than a third of all white Democrats and independents — voters Obama can't win the White House without — agreed with at least one negative adjective about blacks, according to the survey, and they are significantly less likely to vote for Obama than those who don't have such views.

Such numbers are a harsh dose of reality in a campaign for the history books. Obama, the first black candidate with a serious shot at the presidency, accepted the Democratic nomination on the 45th anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech, a seminal moment for a nation that enshrined slavery in its Constitution.

"There are a lot fewer bigots than there were 50 years ago, but that doesn't mean there's only a few bigots," said Stanford political scientist Paul Sniderman who helped analyze the exhaustive survey.

The pollsters set out to determine why Obama is locked in a close race with McCain even as the political landscape seems to favor Democrats. President Bush's unpopularity, the Iraq war and a national sense of economic hard times cut against GOP candidates, as does that fact that Democratic voters outnumber Republicans.

Issue among Democrats
The findings suggest that Obama's problem is close to home — among his fellow Democrats, particularly non-Hispanic white voters. Just seven in 10 people who call themselves Democrats support Obama, compared to the 85 percent of self-identified Republicans who back McCain.

The survey also focused on the racial attitudes of independent voters because they are likely to decide the election.

Lots of Republicans harbor prejudices, too, but the survey found they weren't voting against Obama because of his race. Most Republicans wouldn't vote for any Democrat for president — white, black or brown.

Not all whites are prejudiced. Indeed, more whites say good things about blacks than say bad things, the poll shows. And many whites who see blacks in a negative light are still willing or even eager to vote for Obama.

On the other side of the racial question, the Illinois Democrat is drawing almost unanimous support from blacks, the poll shows, though that probably wouldn't be enough to counter the negative effect of some whites' views.

Race is not the biggest factor driving Democrats and independents away from Obama. Doubts about his competency loom even larger, the poll indicates. More than a quarter of all Democrats expressed doubt that Obama can bring about the change they want, and they are likely to vote against him because of that.

Three in 10 of those Democrats who don't trust Obama's change-making credentials say they plan to vote for McCain.

Still, the effects of (Democrat) whites' racial views are apparent in the polling.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Obama Denies Ties To Fannie May Chief

Campaign accepted more than $400k from Fannie May

image Some things just don't pass the 'smell test' and here's one of them.

Today the Obama campaign put out a statement from former head of Fannie May Franklin Raines that he is not an "advisor" to the Obama campaign.

This simply stated, doesn't pass the 'smell test.'

The Obama camp has taken more than $400,000 in campaign contributions from Fannie May.  Franklin Raines is now the disgraced former CEO of Fannie May.

Perhaps you remember Fannie May?  That's the Mortage financier that went belly-up earlier this week and required a government bailout to survive.  Franklin Raines is the CEO who literally ran Fannie May into the ground and received a golden parachute, to the tune of more than $10,000,000 dollars in "severance" as he exited the company when the U.S. Treasury Dept. assumed control.

Not only did Raines get a golden parachute, reports are that he LIED to Government officials as to the status of assets on Fannie May's books.

So we have two questions for the Obama Campaign:

1. When are you going to give back the corrupt money that Fannie May gave to your campaign?  Since the American taxpayers are bailing out Fannie May, isn't that really taxpayer money that Obama's clinging on to?

2. What role does Jamie Gorelic have in the Obama Campaign?  Gorelic received more than $26 million dollars in compensation from Fannie May in 2007/2008.  Our readers may remember Gorelic as the woman who issued the legal opinion in the Clinton Administration that put the "Chinese Wall" up between the FBI and CIA - prohibiting them from sharing information about domestic and foreign terrorist organizations.  Gorelic's "legal opinion" is widely assigned as one of the reasons Osama Bin Laden and his al-Qaeda operatives were able to successfully operate and train in flight schools in this country, while preparing for the Sept. 11th 2001 terrorist attacks that killed more than 3,000 people in the WTC, the Pentagon and on Flight 93 in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

While we await the Obama campaign's response, we can't help but think that this is the kind of "change" that Obama wants to inflict on this country.

NoBama.  No way.

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Barak Obama's Fannie May/Freddie Mac Connection

Anyone who's bothered to review FEC Campaign Finance reports in the last thirty days has probably noticed what I have:

Barak Obama has received more than $400,000 in donations from Fannie May.

So as Obama attacks John McCain and Republican policies for the failures of Fannie May, Freddie Mac and Lehman (amongst others) it's important to do one thing:


Obama has $400,000 reasons to deflect criticism away from himself and onto John McCain. 

What's more important however, is that Lehman Brother's collapse can be traced directly back to Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac's collapse. 

Lehman was highly leveraged in two markets: subprime mortgages, and oil hedge funds.  Where did Lehman buy these poorly securitized mortgages from?  None other than Fannie & Freddie. 

As the subprime mortgage market collapsed out from underneath them, rising oil prices were there to offset Lehman's losses.  But now that the oil bu bble has "popped" and Lehman's highly leveraged "liquidity" evaporated out from underneath them.

The same thing has now happened to AIG, and is about to cause WaMu a whole world of hurt.

So as Obama rails against John McCain and Republican Parties, remember two things:

First, John McCain introduced legislation in 2005 to reform Fannie May & Freddie Mac to avert this very problem.

Second, Barak Hussein Obama has a less than zero interest in actually reforming Fannie & Freddie.  Again, he has $400,000 reasons not to do it. 

Pretty impressive for a junior Senator with less than 4 years in the U.S. Senate to be the #2 recipient of Fannie May & Freddie Mac campaign contributions.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Obama Inflates His Role In Economic Stimulus

Liar, Liar, Pants On Fire!

Today, Barak Hussein Obama told a whopper.

Not just any whopper, a king-sized whopper.

Obama told a crowd in Golden, Colorado today that he created the bi-partisan economic stimulus plan.

Perhaps you remember the plan?  It's the one that sent rebate checks to many Americans.

But an examination of the bill and the Roll Call Vote for H.R. 5410 (Economic Stimulus Act of 2008) shows that Obama WASN'T PRESENT for the vote on Feb. 7th of this year!  Neither was Senator Hillary Clinton, who likely was out on campaign trail herself.

But who did see this as an important piece of legislation and ensured he was on the floor of the U.S. Senate to vote?  John McCain.

 Read it and weep, Obamanuts.  Not only didn't Barak Hussein Obama not create H.R. 5140, he didn't bother to show up and vote for "his own bill!"

Surely a Senator that creates such an important bill would show up to vote for it!  That is unless, he voted for it before voting against it!

Once again, we see how Barak Hussein Obama's "judgement" is more than a little questionable when it comes to serving the American People.  We deserve more than the 'lip service' that Obama gives.

Obama Tries To Politicize Economy

While Barak Obama flies to Hollywood to attend a $28,000 per plate dinner with his hollywood elitist friends (all while claiming to represent the 'average guy") he stopped to take a pot shot at John McCain and the Republican Party over the economy.

Let's be clear on one basic point: Barak Obama WANTS the economy to be bad.  He WANTS people to suffer economically so he can make political points and political hay to win an election.

To make matters worse, Obama has been hiding the FACT that major players in both Fannie May and Freddie Mac have helped fund his campaign and assisted him in finding a VP.

The only person who's taken more money from Fannie May and Freddie Mac is fellow Democrat Christopher Dodd (Source: FEC reports.)

John McCain
Vienna, OH
September 16, 2008

John McCain: "We've seen a telling moment in this campaign today. Senator Obama saw an economic crisis, and he's found a political opportunity. My friends, this is not a time for political opportunism; this is a time for leadership.

"Too often, we hear people say America's in decline. I reject that. I believe America's best days are ahead of us. Governor Palin and I are going to reform Wall Street. We're going to reform Washington. I'm going to fight for you, and I'm going to lead our nation forward in the greatest periods of prosperity in its history.

"And let's have some straight talk. Senator Obama is not interested in the politics of hope, he's interested in his political future and that's why he is hurling in insults and making up facts about his record.

"Today, he claimed that the Congressional stimulus package was his idea. That's news to those of us in Congress who supported it. Senator Obama didn't even show up to vote.

"He talks a tough game on the financial crisis, but the facts tell a different story. Senator Obama took more money from Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac than anyone but the chairman of the committee they answer to, and he put Fannie Mae's CEO, who helped create this problem in charge of finding his Vice President. That's not change, that's what's broken in Washington.

"He talked about siding with the people, siding with the people, just before he flew off to Hollywood for a fundraiser with Barbara Streisand and his celebrity friends. Let me tell you, my friends, there's no place I'd rather be than here, with the working men and women of Ohio. I'm going to fight for you and together we're going to win in November."

We couldn't help but post this retort from Senator John McCain this afternoon on the campaign trail from Vienna, Ohio. 

Your comments are welcome in the comments section.

Obama "in touch" with Average Guy

$28,000 a plate fund-raiser shows how "in touch" he is

While declaring yesterday that "the nation faces its most serious financial crisis since the Great Depression", Obama continued with his plans to have a $28,000 per plate fundraiser in Beverly Hills, California.  His total take for the day: a record $9 million dollars.

After dinner, Barbara Streisand sang at the five-star Beverly Wilshire for the Obamanuts. 

Is this hFraud-721827-SMALLow Barak Hussein Obama stays "in touch" with the Average Joe?

After complaining earlier in the day that Senator John McCain was out of touch, is it right to go ahead with a record breaking $9 million dollar, single-event fund-raiser in the heart of Liberal California, surrounded by Hollywood Elitists?

Here in the People's Socialist RepubliK of Illannoyed, we have a saying - "Stupid is as Stupid does."

But hey, Barak is in touch with the average guy, right?  Surely he feels our pain! (/sarc.) 

Monday, September 15, 2008

Obama Tried To Stall Iraq Withdrawl

Met with Iraqi Government To Negotiate Delaying Troop Withdrawls Until After Elections

Source: New York Post, Amir Taheri

WHILE campaigning in public for a speedy withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, Sen. Barack Obama has tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.

According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.

"He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington," Zebari said in an interview.

Obama insisted that Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops - and that it was in the interests of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its "state of weakness and political confusion."

"However, as an Iraqi, I prefer to have a security agreement that regulates the activities of foreign troops, rather than keeping the matter open." Zebari says.

Though Obama claims the US presence is "illegal," he suddenly remembered that Americans troops were in Iraq within the legal framework of a UN mandate. His advice was that, rather than reach an accord with the "weakened Bush administration," Iraq should seek an extension of the UN mandate.

While in Iraq, Obama also tried to persuade the US commanders, including Gen. David Petraeus, to suggest a "realistic withdrawal date." They declined.

Obama has made many contradictory statements with regard to Iraq. His latest position is that US combat troops should be out by 2010. Yet his effort to delay an agreement would make that withdrawal deadline impossible to meet.

Supposing he wins, Obama's administration wouldn't be fully operational before February - and naming a new ambassador to Baghdad and forming a new negotiation team might take longer still.

By then, Iraq will be in the throes of its own campaign season. Judging by the past two elections, forming a new coalition government may then take three months. So the Iraqi negotiating team might not be in place until next June.

Then, judging by how long the current talks have taken, restarting the process from scratch would leave the two sides needing at least six months to come up with a draft accord. That puts us at May 2010 for when the draft might be submitted to the Iraqi parliament - which might well need another six months to pass it into law.

Thus, the 2010 deadline fixed by Obama is a meaningless concept, thrown in as a sop to his anti-war base.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and the Bush administration have a more flexible timetable in mind.

According to Zebari, the envisaged time span is two or three years - departure in 2011 or 2012. That would let Iraq hold its next general election, the third since liberation, and resolve a number of domestic political issues.

Even then, the dates mentioned are only "notional," making the timing and the cadence of withdrawal conditional on realities on the ground as appreciated by both sides.

Iraqi leaders are divided over the US election. Iraqi President Jalal Talabani (whose party is a member of the Socialist International) sees Obama as "a man of the Left" - who, once elected, might change his opposition to Iraq's liberation. Indeed, say Talaban's advisers, a President Obama might be tempted to appropriate the victory that America has already won in Iraq by claiming that his intervention transformed failure into success.

Malik's advisers have persuaded him that Obama will win - but the prime minister worries about the senator's "political debt to the anti-war lobby" - which is determined to transform Iraq into a disaster to prove that toppling Saddam Hussein was "the biggest strategic blunder in US history."

Other prominent Iraqi leaders, such as Vice President Adel Abdul-Mahdi and Kurdish regional President Massoud Barzani, believe that Sen. John McCain would show "a more realistic approach to Iraqi issues."

Obama has given Iraqis the impression that he doesn't want Iraq to appear anything like a success, let alone a victory, for America. The reason? He fears that the perception of US victory there might revive the Bush Doctrine of "pre-emptive" war - that is, removing a threat before it strikes at America.

Despite some usual equivocations on the subject, Obama rejects pre-emption as a legitimate form of self -defense. To be credible, his foreign-policy philosophy requires Iraq to be seen as a failure, a disaster, a quagmire, a pig with lipstick or any of the other apocalyptic adjectives used by the American defeat industry in the past five years.

Yet Iraq is doing much better than its friends hoped and its enemies feared. The UN mandate will be extended in December, and we may yet get an agreement on the status of forces before President Bush leaves the White House in January.

Sunday, September 14, 2008

OBama: "One Of The Prettiest Sounds On Earth Is The Muslim Call to Prayer"

Can Recide Call To Prayer "With Perfect Accent"

From the New York Times no less, published in March of 2007.  This confirms the speculation that Barak Hussein Obama attended a muslim madrassa, learned the koran, and was raised - at least for a time - a muslim.

Excerpts from "Obama, Man of the World" published March 6th, 2007 in the New York Times:

“I was a little Jakarta street kid,” he said in a wide-ranging interview in his office (excerpts are on my blog, He once got in trouble for making faces during Koran study classes in his elementary school

Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it’ll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.”

Moreover, Mr. Obama’s own grandfather in Kenya was a Muslim. Mr. Obama never met his grandfather and says he isn’t sure if his grandfather’s two wives were simultaneous or consecutive, or even if he was Sunni or Shiite. (O.K., maybe Mr. Obama should just give up on Alabama.)

These stunning statements should put to rest any "speculation" that obama_muslim_garb Barak Hussein Obama was raised as a muslim.  Attending a madrassa, studying the koran, knowing the 'call to prayer' and being able to recite the opening lines of the "prayer" in perfect accent should give all reasonable American voters pause.

Having given Obama the benefit of a doubt previously, there is no longer any doubt in this writers mind that Obama is a muslim in Christian clothing.  Moments of 'honesty' such as that above has removed any such claim to Christianity that Obama has made.

Barak Hussein Obama is as Christian as Louis Farrakkhan or Jeremiah Wright.

For more information, we invite you to visit The Audacity Of Truth, Obama's Upbringing

Saturday, September 13, 2008

The Mistake Is Calling The Iraq War "A Mistake"

Joe Cook is an Iraq War Veteran from Wauconda, Illinois - Barak Obama's home state.  He has experience in the Iraq War, knows those who made the ultimate sacrifice, and made quite a sacrifice himself.

If you watch no other video on this site, please watch this one.  I promise you, it's worth it.  And if I ever see Joe Cook during my travels through Northern Illinois (as I also live here..) it would be my honor and privilege to shake his hand and say "Thank You" to a true war hero.

Obama Losing in Florida, Pennsylvania

Key Battleground States Swing To McCain

Here's something for the Obama campaign to try and put some lipstick on: The St. Petersburg Times in Florida and Zogby both show that the millions and millions of dollars that Obama has dumped into Florida these past 19 months is for naught. 

McCain has opened up a six point lead in Florida and has only recently begun to run campaign commercials in the state.

This has so distressed the Obama campaign that there's now talk of pulling funding from Florida to focus elsewhere.

This marks the third of the five key battleground sobama-sunking-shiptates that has swung towards McCain since Sarah Palin became McCain's running mate and after the Republican Convention.  (The other two are Ohio and Pennsylvania, where the trends show McCain +5 over Obama.)

Comparing the 2004 statistics, this places Obama in worse shape than John Kerry was at the same point in time during the 2004 election cycle.

Of the four polls that are coming out tomorrow, one shows a "tied" race, the other three show McCain leading by as much as 8 percentage points.

This couldn't be more diastrous news for the Democrats who are now seeing their chances of building on their majorities in the House and Senatelipstick on obama slip away.

We reported last week that those Democrats who won during the 2006 mid-term elections a re now running away from Obama.  As the party's Presidential candidate goes, so goes the party!

No matter how much lipstick the Democrats try putting on the pig that is the Obama candidacy, Barak Hussein Obama is still a (male chauvinist) pig!

Dope Dealers Endorse Obama

Pair arrested for bags of 'Obama'

Delare Delco Times

Two Delaware residents are giving new meaning to the term "pushing" Obama, according to criminal drug charges filed Thursday.

Fifty-two bags of heroin in bags stamped both with letters spelling out OBAMA and an image in the likeness of Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama were confiscated following a routine car stop on Interstate 95 in Upper Chichester, according to Pennsylvania State Police.

Arrested were driver Nichelle Prince, 26, and Jacquene Walker, 21. The two were arraigned on drug offenses before Magisterial District Judge David J. Murphy in Aston. Bail was set at 10 percent of $20,000 each.

During an inventory search, Thompson found four bundles of heroin stamped "OBAMA" in the console of the car. Prince and Walker were arrested without incident.

You just can't make this stuff up ... Dope Dealers for Obama!

Show Your Support For Sarah

Normally I wouldn't direct traffic to another site, but CafePress has some really good McCain/Palin stuff on their site. 

Click the picture below to browse their site.

Yard Sign

Thursday, September 11, 2008

The Real Lipstick On A Pig

Apparently, Investors Business Daily thought this was too 'hot' (or too politically incorrect - you decide which) to publish.

Well, what's good for the goose, is good for the gander as Grandma told me when I was growing up ...

So how are you liking that lipstick, Obama?

Democrats Fear OBama Fallout

"Growing sense of doom amongst Democrats"

The nomination of Sarah Palin has definitely changed the dynamics of the 2008 election cycle.  Democrats who once seemed assured of building on their majorities in the House and Senate, and potentially achieving a "veto-proof" Senate now seem not so sure about their prospects this November.

The tide has turned so much against this Do Nothing Democrat Congress that they now fear losing seats in both houses of Congress. 

First term Democrats who won in the landslide of 2006 are now facing stiff competition in maintaining their seats.  As recently as mid August, many of these same Democrats felt as if they were cruising to victory without needing to fight.  Now they're struggling just to stay even in their respective races.  Some are actually starting to run away from OBama.

Don't take my word for it, here it is in today's Financial Times, the  Financial Industry's leading publication.

Democrats on Capitol Hill fear Obama fallout

By Andrew Ward in Washington

Published: September 11 2008 23:30 | Last updated: September 11 2008 23:30

Democratic jitters about the US presidential race have spread to Capitol Hill, where some members of Congress are worried that Barack Obama’s faltering campaign could hurt their chances of re-election.

Party leaders have been hoping to strengthen Democratic control of the House and Senate in November, but John McCain’s jump in the polls has stoked fears of a Republican resurgence.

A Democratic fundraiser for Congressional candidates said some planned to distance themselves from Mr Obama and not attack Mr McCain.

“If people are voting for McCain it could help Republicans all the way down the ticket, even in a year when the Democrats should be sweeping all before us,” said the fundraiser, a former Hillary Clinton supporter.

“There is a growing sense of doom among Democrats I have spoken to . . . People are going crazy, telling the campaign ‘you’ve got to do something’.”

Concern was greatest among first-term representatives who won seats in traditionally Republican districts in the landslide of 2006. “Several of them face a real fight to hold on to those seats,” the fundraiser said.

Tony Podesta, a senior Democratic lobbyist, said members of Congress were “a little nervous” after Mr McCain shook up the race with his choice of Sarah Palin as running mate and intensified attacks on Mr Obama.

“Republicans have been on the offensive for the past two weeks . . . You don’t win elections on the defensive.”

The campaign manager for a first-term Democratic congressman from a blue-collar district in the north-east rejected suggestions that Mr Obama had become a liability. He said his candidate would reach out to Republicans and avoid attacks on Mr McCain.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

OBama / Biden Parting Ways?

Biden States Hillary Clinton Better VP Candidate Than He Is

The Dumb Dem's must really be getting desperate.  Here Joe Biden states that Hillary Clinton would be a better VP candidate than he is.

Does Biden sense trouble in the water in the Obama campaign, and is he getting ready to bail?  With all the stupid things that Joe Biden has said over the years, Obama's "lipstick on a pig" reference to Palin must have Joe Biden cringing.

As the Obama campaign goes into catastrophic failure while the polling indicates major shifts towards McCain/Palin, we here at NoBamaNation officially start the "Joe Biden Quits The Campaign Clock!"

Our best guess: T-Minus 10 days and counting until Biden quits the campaign.

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

"If You Put Lipstick on a Pig, It's Still a Pig"

Obama's Personal Attacks on Palin Reason For His Fall in Polls

The more the Democrats and Barak Hussein Obama attack Sarah Palin, the more they sink in the polls.

If today's attack by Obama wasn't bad enough, the Democrat Party sent more than 30 attorneys, 25 "opposition researchers" and reporters loyal to the Democrat Party to Anchorage, Alaska to dig up dirt on Sarah Palin. 

Apparently the Dumb Dem's and Barak Hussein Obama haven't figured out the more they personally attack Sarah Palin the worse their polling numbers.

Case in point.  Since the Republican Convention, the Dumb Dem's have ratcheted up their personal attacks on Palin using the liberal media.  Here are the results:

John McCain now leads Barak Hussein Obama  garnering 52% of registered, Independent voters.  Prior to the Republican Convention and the Democrat's assault on Sarah Palin, McCain had only 40%.

Amongst Democrats, McCain's support grew from 9% to 14% post Convention and attacks on Sarah Palin.  Here, Obama is losing his own base due to his negative, personal attacks on Sarah Palin.

The Trend in Presidential Preferences amongst Democrats is tracking this way, according to Gallup:

As of September 8th, support for Obama from Independent voters has dropped to 37%, down from 45% in April of '08.

And now, here's one that's sure to make the Obamanuts weep.  Amongst "moderate" Democrats, McCain's support is up 5% post Convention and attacks on Palin.

"Conservative" Democrats now support McCain by 25% (up 10 percentage points since the convention.)

Pure Independents now favor by an increased 19 percentage points all while McCain's Republican support has remained steady.  Clearly, McCain/Palin have gained much traction with Independents and right-thinking Democrats post convention and they're voting with their feet due to Obama's personal attacks on Palin.

Is it any wonder the Obama campaign is turning to personal attacks?  The polling trends do not bode well for them.  Increasingly, Independents and Democrats themselves are turning towards McCain/Palin.

The conclusion here is simple: The personal attacks on Palin are the reason.  The drop in Obama's polling occurs IMMEDIATELY after Obama/Biden and the Democrat Party along with their willing co-conspirators the liberal mainstream media whores began their attacks on Sarah Palin.

No matter how Obama/Biden and their media cohorts at ABCNBCCBSMSNBCCNN want to spin it, that's the reality.

Got Lipstick?

Monday, September 8, 2008

McCain/Palin +10 in latest USA Today/Gallup Poll

Read it and weep, Obamanuts.  I told you so yesterday on Paltalk and you didn't listen;

USA Today/Gallup Poll

A Word About "Change"

Does America really want the "change" that Barack Hussein OBama and the most liberal do-nothing Congress in history have to offer?

Consider this.  During the first 6 years of the Bush Presidency, the economy was humming along at more than 3.5% GDP Growth a year.  Unemployment in this country was historically low.  Everyone that truly wanted a job, had a job.

Then, the Democrats took control of Congress in January, 2006 and began wreaking havoc on the economy.  Here is the result of the Nancy Pelosi/Harry Reid/Barack Hussein Obama triumverate of evil in the U.S. Congress.

It was only back in August, 2007 that:

1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) the unemployment rate was 4.5%.
4) the DOW JONES hit a record high--14,000 +
5) Americans were buying new cars, taking cruises, vacations overseas, and living large!...

But Americans wanted 'CHANGE'!

So, what did they do? In 2006, they voted in a Democratic Congress, and boy --- did we get "Change." This is what's happened under the Democrat Controlled Congress in just the past 11 months:

1) Consumer confidence has plummeted to a 7 year low.
2) Gasoline is now approximately $4 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 54% (a 15% increase);
4) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $12 TRILLION DOLLARS and prices still dropping;
5) 2% of American homes are in foreclosure.
6) THE DOW is probing another low (11,100)

7) $2.5 TRILLION DOLLARS has evaporated from the retirement portfolios (Stocks, Bonds, Mutual Funds) of millions of working Americans

And if that isn't enough, Speaker Of The House, Nancy Pelosi, & Senate Majority leader, Harry Reed (both Liberal Democrats), will not allow a vote on more oil exploration in the USA.

Not that a vote will matter, the Democrats have nominated the most liberal, do-nothing, no-record-of-accomplishment candidate ever in Barack Hussein Obama who has already stated he is OPPOSED to any OFFSHORE drilling and the development of new energy supplies in the United States! 

Obama's answer: inflate your tires!

We sure got change, didn't we?

Now OBama says he's going to give us "Real Change!"

Just how much Democrat "Change" do you think this country can stand?


Sunday, September 7, 2008

McCain Moving Ahead of Obama in Major Polls

I was challenged on these facts this morning on an internet chat program (Paltalk) with Obama supporters in full denial, so here's the polls I was referring to:

Gallup showing McCain/Palin moving ahead of OBama/Biden post convention (click the picture for the full sized image.)

Zogby reporting that McCain is +5 over OBama/Biden:










Most importantly, these polls reflect three things that the liberal mainsteam media whores won't talk about.

First, McCain's favorables are higher than Barak Hussein OBama's.

Second, OBama never got a convention "bounce."  The Palin/VP announcement erased any convention bounce that OBama may have received. 

Third, the Republican National Convention was the most watched convention in history.  Wednesday evening, 41.1 million people watched Sarah Palin vs. Barak OBama's 40 million.  More than 43 million people watched John McCain's acceptance speech. 

What do these observations show?

First, after 19 months of "campaigning" and liberal lamestream media trashing of the war in Iraq, the economy and Republicans in general, the American Voters aren't all that enthralled with the Democrats. 

Second, American voters recognize the Democrats haven't offered any new ideas, and are simply running on the "We're not Bush!" agenda - which failed them in 2004. 

Third, $4/gallon gas, and an inability to communicate an energy policy hasn't helped the Democrats.  The American Public sees a Democrat controlled Congress as obstacles to lowering energy prices through offshore drilling, and using more of our own resources.  Here the Democrats have shown the American Public just who controls the party - left wing environmental extremists who think we should all be living in caves.

Fourth, the surge demonstrably having worked in Iraq despite the objections of Democrats and their "messiah" Barak Hussein Obama.  OBama only recently (9/5 - The O'Reilly Factor) finally admitted that the surge "Succeeded beyond anyone's wildest dreams."

Finally, the "leading" candidate for President comes from the same political party that has a whopping 9% approval rating over the last year.  How is it this guy OBama managed to pull that off?  Rhetoric, plain and simple.

After 19 months of trashing Republican's and "campaigning" you'd think OBama would have more to show for himself. 

The reality is, the Democrats are in big trouble this election.  Any dreams they have of increasing their majorities in the House & Senate are rapidly diminishing - no matter what the liberal lamestream media whores like to say.

Speaking of the liberal lamestream media whores, I'm sure Joseph Goebbels would be proud. The Nazi's at least had to work to control the media in Germany during World War II.  We in America have a bunch of liberals in the media that willingly get in bed with the Democrat Party and spew their propaganda at the American public on a daily basis.

Goebbels would be proud indeed.

Barak OBama Admits Muslim Faith

From the Sunday, Sept. 7th edition of "This Week" with George Stephanopolous:

Freudian slip, or finally an admission?  Given Sept. 11th is just 4 days away and many right-thinking Americans will somberly remember what happened on that fateful day seven years ago, this highly insensitive remark by OBama (which was later corrected by Stephanopolous himself, not OBama) should have all voting American's thinking about just who they're going to pull the lever for President for on November 4th. 

Which are you voting for?

john_mccain obama-early

John S. McCain
VietNam War Hero

Barry Soetro
a.k.a. Barak Hussein OBama

We report, you decide.

Saturday, September 6, 2008

Obama Crowds Dropping

800 Show Up To Hear Obama in Terre Haute, Indiana

It must be getting tougher and tougher to be Barak Hussein Obama these days.  Today, only 800 people showed up to hear "The Messiah" speak in a relatively populous area of Indiana.

From the Minneapolis Star Tribune:

Obama made his first direct criticism of Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin on Saturday, saying she pretends to oppose spending earmarks when she actually has embraced them.

Speaking to 800 people at the Wabash Valley Fairgrounds in Terre Haute, Ind., the Democratic presidential nominee ridiculed McCain and his running mate, the Alaska governor, for describing themselves as agents of change at last week's GOP convention.

From 75,000 at Pepsi Stadium in Denver, to 800 in Terre Haute, Indiana.  My, how the mighty have fallen.

Sarah Palin - Charlie Rose Green Room Video.

Here's an opportunity to compare and contrast Barak Obama with Sarah Palin.  In her own words, she describes her own life experiences, including her time as Governor and now VP Candidate.

What was Sarah Palin doing two years ago?  She was a new governor rooting out corruption in her own party, in her own state.

What was Barak Hussein Obama doing two years ago?  Well, he had just come out of a 4 year stint as a Junior Illinois State Legislator who'd voted "Present" more than 130 times in 4 years without sponsoring a single, meaningful peace of legislation in Illinois and was just starting in the U.S. Senate.  The same Barak Hussein Obama who used the corrupt Chicago Democrat Machine headed by Mayor Richard Daley to get elected.  Obama never took on the corruption in Chicago or in Cook County, Illinois.  He never spoke out against his good friend Tony Rezko stealing $43 million dollars of Illinois taxpayer money, and certainly Barak Hussein Obama never spoke out against the slums in his own district - arguably the worst in the country.

Barak Obama wasn't doing much two years ago, other than starting in the U.S. Senate and hoping for another free ride, compliments of the stupid voters of the State of Illinois.  (I say stupid because I live here and I see it daily!)

Obama's Profoundly Wrong on Iraq

"Good judgment in the commander in chief can make the difference between victory & defeat, between avoiding a crisis and inviting a catastrophe." And the best case point is the surge in Iraq which Barack Obama opposed because he said it was doomed to fail."

"But just last night (Thursday, Sept. 4th)  (boos) just last night senator Obama finally broke and brought himself to admit what all the rest of us have known for quite some time and that’s thanks to the skill and valor of our troops the surge in iraq has succeeded. (applause)"

"Senator obama said that the surge 'succeeded beyond our wildest dreams'. I think said senator Obama that the surge has succeeded in ways that nobody anticipated."

"I guess when you turn out to be profoundly wrong on a vital national security issue maybe its comforting to pretend that everyone else was was wrong too."

"But I remember it a little differently. It seems to me there was one leader in Washington who did predict success, who refused to call retreat and risked his own career for the sake of the surge and victory in Iraq and ladies and gentlemen that man is standing right next to me senator John McCain."

- Sarah Palin

Thursday, September 4, 2008

OBama Finally Admits: "The Surge Was A Success Beyond Our Wildest Dreams"

Breaking news: Barak Hussein OBama admits during an interview with Fox News Channels Bill O'Reilly:

“I think that the surge has succeeded in ways that nobody anticipated,” Obama said while refusing to retract his initial opposition to the surge. “I’ve already said it’s succeeded beyond our wildest dreams.”

This is the ultimate OBama flip-flop.  As recently as this past July while campaigning in several key battleground states, OBama continued to belittle the troop surge in Iraq and deny that it was in fact, working.

What possibly could've brought Barak Hussein OBama to his knees on this issue, finally admitting what American's have known all along?

Consider this.  It's been less than 24 hours since Sarah "The Barracuda" Palin addressed her critics at the Republican National Convention.  As I watched her, I couldn't help but to think how proud Ronald Reagan would be at that particular moment.  Just like him, she used humor, facts, straight talk, and candor with the American people to define her opponents, and then what she would do.

Sarah Palin is the Democrat's worst nightmare: A Conservative woman with her act together, living a life of integrity and "walking the walk." 

The reality is, the Democrats are afraid of Sarah Palin.  That's why they've turned up the attacks on her.  Unfortunately for them, Palin is literally fearless.  She showed her lack of fear within seconds of being on stage last night, and pulled off what will go down as the equivalent of Reagan's "the speech." 

The proof they're running scared?  Finally, Barak Hussein Obama admits a truth we've known all along.  And it was none other than Sarah "The Barracuda" Palin who began dragging Obama/Biden to the truth last night.

McCain/Palin?  I say, Palin/McCain!

Bye Bye OBama.

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

OBama Supporters Threaten Race War

In Today's Philadelphia Daily News, columnist Fatimah Ali threatens a full-fledged race war if John McCain wins the nomination.

From the article:

If McCain wins, look for a full-fledged race and class war, fueled by a deflated and depressed country, soaring crime, homelessness - and hopelessness!

A shining example of an "unbiased media" to be sure. 

This is however a perfect example of the type of thinking this country is up against in this election.  Threatening 'race wars' if their chosen candidate doesn't win?

Bring it on but remember this: Your actions will cost the Democrat party major party status for the next 5 generations. 

If I were you Fatimah, I'd stay out of Rural America with an attitude like yours.  You're likely to run up against an attitude adjustment you might not like too much.