Monday, October 8, 2012

Obama Support Collapsing in Illinois

Tied in Congressional District He Won by 23 Points in ‘08.  Is Illinois in Play?

Source: http://www.breitbart.com

Editor’s Note: The Author of this blog lives in Will County, IL.  A “Collar County of Cook County, IL and Chicago.  The author, Mike Flynn of Breitbart.com has his facts in order in the story below.  There are NO Obama signs in my Congressional District.  There are a plethora of Romney-Ryan signs with new ones popping up daily.

By MIKE FLYNN

Back in August, a poll showed Obama with just a 12-point lead over Romney in Cook County, Illinois. While he posted a huge lead in the city of Chicago, the poll found him actually losing to Romney in suburban Cook County. It was a shock that I set aside as an outlier.

A new poll of Illinois' 10th Congressional District, which includes parts of Cook County, however, suggests the August poll might not be such an aberration. The poll, from WeAskAmerica, finds Obama with just a 2 point lead over Romney, 47-45 in the suburban district. Obama won the district in 2008 by 23 points.

I know the district well. It is affluent, with high levels of education, and very socially liberal. Voters there take pride in being politically "moderate" and wear the label as a badge of honor. Since the 1980s, the district has been represented by a Republican in Congress, but not by anyone who could be mistaken for a conservative. Al Gore and John Kerry both carried the district comfortably in 2000 and 2004. And, in 2008, Obama won over 61% of the vote in the district.

Last year, during redistricting, the Democrats in Illinois made the district even more Democrat, looking to unseat freshman GOP Congressman Bob Dold. In this poll, Dold leads his opponent by 2 points, 47-45. It should be noted that this poll was conducted before last night's debate, so the surprising results don't reflect Obama's lackluster performance in Denver.

Obama's performance in this district in 2008 was emblematic of the appeal he had then to moderates and independents. No Democrat had ever come close to posting the kind of vote he got here. It was also an enormous source of campaign donations for his election. Being essentially tied with Romney, and under the 50% threshold, shows the greatly diminished appeal he has to independents.

"For Mr. Obama to be in a statistical tie in an area that he won by around 20 points in 2008 truly reveals the failure of his Presidency," said Illinois-based political consultant Paul Miller. "The economy is undoubtedly the key factor, but in suburbs with a large Jewish population, his treatment of Israel is also taking its toll."

There is a sizable Jewish vote in the district. It could account for the rising dissatisfaction with Obama here. Also a factor could be the lack of leadership from Illinois' Democrat legislative leaders, who dominate state government and are quickly bankrupting the state. The state's debt level has exploded and recent massive tax hikes have done nothing to plug the state's gaping budget deficits.

I should note that the sample in the poll is evenly split between GOP and Dem voters. That may be a bit generous to the GOP, but even this can't explain the collapse in Obama's numbers here. A drop of more than 20 points one month out from the election is damning for Obama. Of course, the poll also deliberately oversampled women. They make up around 65% of the poll's universe. Given the purported advantage Obama has with women voters, his margin in this poll should be considerably higher.

Miller continued: "Unfortunately for the GOP, they wrote off Illinois before the campaign season began. Considering that President Obama may under-perform by a large percentage, and that his numbers in Cook County are not nearly as strong as they were four years ago, Illinois could have been in play. It may not be too late to make Illinois purple."

Given the state of the GOP in Illinois, I'm not certain Romney could have made Illinois competitive this year. Certainly, Obama continues to have the edge in his adopted home state. But, among the base of some of his core supporters, the thrill is clearly gone.

 

Another Green Energy Disaster for Obama

Plant That Received $150 Million Closing

OBAMA/Here’s another disaster for the Obama Administration’s “Green Energy” plans.  A Michigan hybrid batter plant that was built with $150 million taxpayer dollars is laying off workers before a single battery has even been produced at the plant.

In 2010 when Obama himself announced the loans, he touted them as being evidence that “manufacturing jobs are coming back to America.”  Two years later, before a single battery has been produced, the plant is closing.

Workers at the Compact Power manufacturing facilities in Holland, Mich., run by LG Chem, have been placed on rotating furloughs, working only three weeks per month based on lack of demand for lithium-ion cells.

The facility, which was opened in July 2010 with a groundbreaking attended by Obama, has yet to produce a single battery for the Chevrolet Volt, the troubled electric car from General Motors.

Production of the taxpayer-subsidized Volt has been plagued by work stoppages, and the effect has trickled down to companies and plants that build parts for it -- including the batteries.

Gee, how about the fact that no one wants a Chevy Volt and that GM has literally shuttered the plant that makes the Volt?

The thing is here folks is that electric car batteries don’t perform much better than they did 100 years ago.  Electric Cars were invented almost 105 years ago now, and in 105 years research has not managed to figure out how to efficiently store energy in compact batteries to make electronic cars viable. 

It’s also a fact that until hundreds of millions of dollars of TAXPAYER money was poured into  them, lithium ion batteries for cars were dead technology.  Private investors had given up on electric cars decades ago having not been able to conquer the battery storage issues plagued by vehicles such as the Volt.

The result?  Obama picked another Green Energy LOSER, at taxpayer expense.

Source: Fox Business News

No comments: