Obama In His Own Words

Denies Biggest Tax Increase In History of World

Obama Denying ObamaCare Increases Taxes

It’s now official because the US Supreme Court says so: ObamaCare is a TAX.
It is the biggest tax increase in the HISTORY of the world to the tune of $500,000,000 (that’s billion, folks.)

Since the US Supreme Court saw fit to re-write legislation and call it a tax, who am I to argue?
Obamacare is dead.  It is now

The Obama Health Tax.

Note to the Romney Campaigin: Call it like it is. It’s the largest tax increase in the history of the world, and give Barack Hussein Obama full credit for it!

Overnight polling shows that more than 70% of American’s disagree with Chief Justice John Roberts and the US Supreme Court decision.  Those numbers are only going to get worse as time goes on. 

The Romney Campaign must seize upon this opportunity because if they do not, Romney will be perceived as “Obama Lite” and be relegated to the political history heap.

Join with the Tea Party folks, here’s our rallying cry.  Obama and the US Supreme Court did exactly what we told them not to prior to the 2010 elections, and now it’s time to exact our revenge.

US Supreme Court Violates Its Constitutional Boundary

Re-Writes Law That Never Contained Word “Tax”

With all due respect to those of you who served our country with honor and distinction, as soon as the USSC court decision came down, I went outside and turned my flag upside down.

Clearly, our country is now lost.

The US Supreme Court today stepped outside its Constitutional boundaries by re-writing “ObamaCare” and in the process handed Congress even MORE power over our daily lives.

The ObamaCare legislation as written did not contain the word "tax" -- anywhere. It used the words "penalties" and "fines" never "tax."

In fact, Obama's own lawyers argued against it being a tax in front of the USSC!

That apparently didn't matter to Justice Roberts who sided with the liberals on the US Supreme Court in re-writing the law to use the word "tax" and declared ObamaCare and the individual mandate CONSTITUTIONAL.

The role of the United State Supreme Court as envisioned by our Founding Fathers was not to make law, but to interpret it in context of the U.S. Constitution to determine whether or not laws – as written and passed by Congress were Constitutional

Today, Chief Justice Roberts sided with the Liberal Activist Judges on the US Supreme Court in violating their Constitutional Mandate by re-writing the ObamaCare law, rather than declaring it Un-Constitutional in violation of the Commerce Clause.  Remember, Obama and the Democrats argued the law was Constitutional under the Commerce Clause!

At this point, Congress can now tell us what to eat, what to buy (or not buy) and tell us if we do not eat what they tell us or buy what the tell us that we'll pay a "tax."

Do people realize the power the USSC just gave Congress and the IRS (a terrorist organization in and of itself?)

Don't want to comply with ObamaCare?  They’ll tax you.  Don’t want to eat what Congress tells you?  They’ll tax you.  Don't pay the tax, the IRS will seize your assets to FORCE you to pay the tax and comply with the law.

That's what happened in our country today.

When in the blue hell is this country going to wake up?

My flag remains upside down until Obama is out of office and this law is REPEALED.

We have a high barrier to overcome this November folks. We have to take back the White House, the Senate and keep the Congress.

Then we have to force the Republicans to REPEAL this law.

Assume after it's REPEALED, there'll be lawsuits challenging the Constitutionality of the Repeal, which will again go to the USSC.

Are we prepared for this battle? Are YOU ready?

Better sign up to help your Republican Senator and Congressman get back in to office, and as much as I don't like it, it's time to "suck it up cupcake" and put Romney in the White House.

That's our only prayer at this point, because that's the only way to overturn this BAD court decision today.

Prediction: US Supreme Court Strikes Individual Mandate

Leaves ObamaCare Taxes In Place

With about an hour to go before the US Supreme Court issues their ruling on ObamaCare, here’s my prediction for how the court will rule.

Individual Mandate: Un-Constitutional.  Justice Breyer will side with the Conservatives on the Court striking down the Individual Mandate.  One only need look at the transcripts and read Justice Breyer’s questions and statements to see he’s very uncomfortable with Congress dictating products individual citizens must buy.  Breyer was first to ask “if Congress can mandate this, where does Congress’ power stop?”  The fact Breyer asked the question and according to the transcript voiced his disagreement with the answer leads me to believe Breyer will side with the Conservatives on the court.

ObamaCare Taxes.  Constitutional.  Congress has the power and authority to issue taxes and that is not a power that the US Supreme Court has ever overturned, or given any indications that it will over turn.

The bottom line here folks is that once again we the People are screwed by the 2006 through 2010 Democrat Controlled Congress’ who passed hundreds of billions of dollars in taxes in the name of “ObamaCare” and no Congress present or future will un-do those taxes.  This government at every level is addicted to the money in our wallets, and they’ll get it one way or another.

Bring on the revolution!

Terrorists In The White House

Islamic Terrorist Hani Nour Eldin has been invited to meet with Obama Administration Officials. 

Terrorists aren’t supposed to get visas, that however doesn't appear to be stopping Obama Administration officials from issuing them.  Did they forget to Google this guy? Nour Eldin is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and an MP from the Islamist Reconstruction and Development Party.


The Muslim Brotherhood is still on the United States Terrorism List, why's this guy going to the White House to meet with Obama Administration officials? 

Paging Mitt Romney ... please pick up a white courtesty phone for an imortant message!
From the Daily Beast:

It was supposed to be a routine meeting for Egyptian legislators in Washington, an opportunity for senior Obama administration officials to meet with new members of Egypt’s parliament and exchange ideas on the future of relations between the two countries.

Instead, the visit this week looks like it’s turning into a political fiasco. Included in the delegation of Egyptian lawmakers was Hani Nour Eldin, who, in addition to being a newly elected member of parliament, is a member of the Gamaa Islamiya, or the Egyptian Islamic Group—a U.S.-designated terrorist organization.

Read the rest at The Daily Beast

Solyndranomics

Obama Doubles-Down On Failed Energy "Policy"

Did I hear Obama correctly yesterday when he "doubled down" on so-called "green energy" having a brighter future than ever?

Yep I sure did, thus the new word "Solyndranomics."

America, if you want to waste BILLIONS of dollars on this farce called "green energy" and give Obama the power to give his politically connected friends BILLIONS of dollars of YOUR hard-earned taxpayer dollars to be wasted on these "green energy" schemes like Solyndra, without any accountability for how your money is being spent or producing any viable results, then vote for Obama.

If you want this nonsense to stop, your choice is clear. Anyone But Obama!

ObamaGirl Refuses To Endorse Obama

Has She Given Up on Hope & Change?

Amber Lee Ettinger, the model-actress made famous for her “Obama Girl” YouTube video in 2008 in which she professed to have a “crush” on Barack Hussein Obama has gone on record as refusing to endorse her former love-crush for the 2012 election.

“At this point I’m keeping that to myself,” she told online mag, “The Daily Caller.”  “If I’m not making videos, I’m not sure it’s anyone’s business who I’m voting for this time around.”

This is quite the turn-around for someone who became nationally known for one thing, and one thing only: a YouTube video endorsing Obama in the 2008 election.

The Amber Lee Ettinger story got me thinking about all the different things I’ve heard folks say this election cycle, as the political rhetoric heats up now that it’s Romney v. Obama. 

Here’s the one thing I have not heard this election cycle:

"I didn't vote for Obama in 2008, but I will this time.

Here are the things I am hearing this election cycle, see how many you recognize:

• It's none of anyone's business who I'm voting for this time.
• I haven't made up my mind yet.
• I think Obama's a likeable guy.
• I'm concerned about the economy.
• My kid who graduated college last year still can’t find a job.
• I'm concerned about my family's well being.
• I'm doing ok, but my friends are really hurting economically.
• My home value has dropped so much these last few years, and there's no end in sight.
• I'm afraid I'll never be able to retire.

All the above are "code" for "I'm sorry I voted for Obama in 2008, and I won't make that mistake again!”

Yet, no one seemingly wants to say it out loud.  Here’s why: They’re afraid of being called a racist!  We’ve heard it for almost four long, horrifying years now: if you disagree with Obama you must be a racist.

Even the pollsters have stopped asking “who will you vote for this election?” and are focusing on Obama’s “likeability” as a way to mask what they already know: Obama’s going to lose in November. 

Why?  Because they themselves don’t want to be in the position of having to publish statistics showing how “racist” the country is.

The fact is, it’s not about race and while we all know that, this “President” now has a 4 year running history of blaming everyone and everything for his failures – except for himself.

Here’s what you and I can count on after election day this November: in some televised interview, Obama or his minion David Axelrod will declare all who voted against him racists.  They may not use the word, but they’ll certainly find a way to say Obama’s color, and not his demonstrably failed policies, are the reason he lost.

That my friends, you can take to the bank.

Obama White House Endangers National Security

Five Impeachable Offenses In Sixty Days

Richard Nixon was nearly impeached before he resigned the Presidency for far less offense than the Obama Administration has committed in the last sixty days, in Obama’s case the cover-up is just beginning.

You may be wondering just what in the blue hell I’m talking about, so let me lay out for you what those impeachable offenses are clearly so that you, my dear reader understand exactly where it is I’m coming from.

Before I begin, let me remind you what the President’s oath of office is:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

The oath of office of the President of the United States is an oath or affirmation required by the United States Constitution before the President begins the execution of the office. The wording is specified in Article Two, Section One, Clause Eight.  (Source: Wikipedia)

How has Obama failed in his Duties as President of the United States?

1. The leak this week of the methods, sources and techniques of this nations capabilities as they pertain to Cyber-Warfare, and our nation’s role in halting Iran’s nuclear capabilities via the Stuxnet virus, which damaged Iranian centrifuges setting Iran back one to two years in their nuclear program.  This was an admission of the United States’ role in the Cyber-War against Iran, and in my opinion was Obama “thumping his chest” publicly to boost his election chances.
2. Leaking our ability to infiltrate muslim terrorist organizations, and how we are able to locate and kill them with drones.  Here we cannot begin to count the number of National Security, FBI, CIA, NSA agents who’s lives are now in danger because of this leak.  Undoubtedly, lives have already been lost we’re just not aware of them yet.
3. Leaking the existence of a CIA double agent embedded inside of al-Qaida.  I don’t think I need to extrapolate on this one.
4. Leaking our capabilities to spy on Iranian nuclear facilities.  Here we’ve given Iran our “playbook” on how we gather information on them, which in turn enables them to counteract our capabilities and stop us from gathering intel.
5. Leaking our war plans, should the United Sates be drawn into war after an Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear sites.

Each one of these leaks endangers the lives of our men and women in Afghanistan and Iraq, our CIA, FBI and NSA intelligence agents overseas, and gives Iran and our enemies our “playbook” on how the United States of America defends itself against its enemies, in this case Iran’s nuclear threat specifically.

Clearly all five are violations of the President’s responsibility to protect and defend the United States of America from all enemies (both foreign and domestic) as well as the Oath of Office which Obama took to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.

There is no doubt in my mind that all five leaks came from the White House directly and that all five leaks were also done to present Obama as “tough on terrorism” in an attempt to boost his election prospects.   Narcissist that he is, Obama just cannot stop bragging about himself or puffing himself up which has now put him in the position of having to defend himself against one of his primarily liberal lamestream media defenders, the New York Times.  Either Obama is lying, or the New York Times is.  Given the New York Times claims dozens of Obama Administration sources stating the leak is coming directly from the White House, who are we to believe? 

The House of Representatives must act to impeach and remove Barack Hussein Obama from office, as is it’s Constitutional Duty under Article I, Section II of the Constitution.

As stated in Federalist No. 65 by Alexander Hamilton, “Impeachment is a method of national inquest into the conduct of public men.”  Hamilton and the framers of the Constitution knew that the history of impeachment as a Constitutional process dated from 14th Century England, when the fledgling Parliament at it’s establishment sought to make the King’s advisors accountable.

What better way to hold Obama accountable for his leaking sensitive information to boost his election prospects than by impeaching him? 

Knowing House Speaker Boehner (R. OH) lacks the backbone to do so, the American People have the responsibility come November to impeach Obama at the ballot box, and remove him from office. 

It is now up to us my friends, to protect and defend the United States of America from all enemies foreign and domestic, and that includes the enemy inside the White House.

Obama Goes Mondale

Promises To Increase Taxes If Re-Elected

If re-elected, Barack Hussein Obama has already promised that he will not allow the Bush Tax Cuts as they’ve come to be known, to be extended “for the wealthiest American’s.” 

Let’s be clear on what “wealthiest American’s” means:

• Do you own a home?
• Do you have a bank account?
• Do you have a job?
• Have you paid Federal Income Taxes in the last year?

If you answered YES to any of the above questions, you’re a Wealthy American!

Obama’s Press Secretary Jay Carney informed reporters onboard Air Force One yesterday (undoubtedly on it's way to or from yet another campaign fundraiser) that Obama “will not support an extension of the Bush Tax Cuts.  Could I be more clear?”

It’s official folks, Obama has gone Mondale.  He’s promising to raise YOUR taxes once re-elected, so he can continue to transfer wealth to the 50% that pay no Federal Income Tax whatsoever.  Letting the Bush Tax Cuts expire will be an additional tax hike on top of the new taxes coming in 2013 to pay for Obamacare!

It’s an escalation of the class-warfare that Obama has been waging since elected, subjecting those of us with a home, a job, a bank account and who just so happen to have enough income to pay Federal Income Tax into TAX SLAVERY for the sloths sitting on their rear ends, eating Government Cheese who are too fat, lazy and stupid to get off their asses and get a job!

On a more positive note, it’s 227 days from today that we, the working, taxpaying American’s get to vote to throw Obama out of office.

Y’all have a nice day now, ya hear?

Source: Politico